'know of' is used when you have personal experience with wha. For me, know implies knowledge of details or individual pieces, while am aware of implies a knowledge only of a whole Using your example, knowing my rights means that i know i have the right to remain silent, the right to be represented by an attorney, etc Being aware of my rights might mean the same thing, but implies that i know that i do have rights, but am not sure what those rights are. In my current job, i'm constantly trying to figure out when the next thing i don't know that i don't know is going to bite me in the butt and cause me to have to rework my code The sentence i'm writing goes like this
But the words know and now are so similar that every time i read. In (2), however, the object of know is not indicated, as you point out, so something must be provided. Alright, well, for example, like on saturdays, y’know, what i liked to do. Should i use did you know or do you know to introduce a fact I've only seen did you know in action My logical deduction is that before the question (which is not much of a question because you're not asking for an answer), you wouldn't have been sure whether the listener'd known about what you're about to say or not.
Can it be used in formal conversation/writing? I primarily want to know which of are or is is the appropriate verb My hunch is that you or somebody you know can be substituted by a plural pronoun, which makes the verb are Conclusions all of the examples cited above—which range in publication year from 1866 to 1955—use the phrase that's for me to know and you to find out (or a close variant) in a very modern way—as a snappy retort to someone who is being inappropriately nosy or who is simply being naturally curious but whose question has prompted a dismissive or teasing response from the speaker
OPEN
